|
HSMWorks second impression
|
||||||
HSMWorks, the good:Of the CAM programs I have tried, I like the HSMWorks user interface the best. It is not quite as easy to setup a part as VisualMill, but it is better once you start making toolpaths.In this episode I did a couple of contours, a 3D Parallel operation, and a facing. A quick look at the other 3D toolpaths shows them to be comprehensive, I suspect they use the ModuleWorks kernel for 3D, like most every other CAM program. I can do spirals and radial and the other toolpaths that I would have to pay extra for if I bought SolidCAM. There was the initial frustration last episode dealing with the setup and tool library, but that is a minor annoyance compared to the slickness of the toolpath dialogs. One thing I love is that there are only 5 tabs in the CAM tree. The tool tab is first, and HSMWorks will pre-select the last used tool, which I love. The geometry tab is pretty straightforward. Like the other programs, if you don't select anything in a facing op, it will machine all the way to the stock outline. I did not need to make a sketch to profile the flat area of the part. I did not need a sketch to control the tool when doing the slopes So far, only SolidCAM was able to do this. I do prefer the SolidCAM method of being able to connect points for a geometry. I prefer the "operations" mentality of HSMWorks compared to the "features" mentality of SolidWorks CAM by CAMWorks. BobCAD CAM also makes you pick a feature geometry and then it decides if it is a pocket, etc. I prefer to "help" the program by telling it I am doing a pocket, or a contour, or whatever. I do like BobCAD's handling of holes, I will do holes in HSMWorks next episode. |
|
The best thing about the HSMWorks UI is that it is not spread out over some giant dialog boxes like the other programs. Most all of what you do is in the side-panel where the SolidWorks tree lives. This means much less mouse movement to fill out the dialogs. The downside is that there is no room to label the boxes. You have to hover over things to get a help tip until you remember what does what. There is this moronic marketing myth that says if you spread the dialog box out with tons of white-space, it is simpler. No, it's worse. There were instances in SolidCAM where the 2D chamfer was invoked by a drop-down on the left of a big dialog box. The 3D chamfer gets invoked by checking a box that is on the right side of a big dialog box. I didn't see that at all. Because the HSMWorks designers forced themselves to stay inside the tree area, it makes the dialogs compact, and for me, much easier to navigate and remember. It was also a lot easier on my wrist since it took so little mouse movement to fill out the dialogs. So far the only giant dialog has been the tool library. I described some difficulties I had with this dialog the last episode, but this is all minor learning-curve stuff. I also has some problems setting up the stock and part zero, but also minor stuff now that I have been through it. My problem is that I am an intermittent prototype user. So I might not use the software for weeks or months before needing it intensely. This makes having a memorable intuitive interface very important to me. The sketchy stuff I can make notes on to remind me what do if I haven't use the program in a while. I got a deal, renting the software for $300 the first year, $500 a year after that. This is a better deal than spending $5000 to buy a package. |
|
This post is in these categories: | |